Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Microsoft update failed 1/10

24 February 2011, Last updated at 12: 18 GMT Samsung user Alex Roebuck took this picture of his phone ' bricked ' Microsoft has revealed that 1 in 10 people who have tried to install a software update about their problems with the Windows mobile experience.

The company had said previously that were affected only a "small number" of phones.

The owners have reported a number of issues after the download, phones damage, to become completely unusable.

Microsoft has pulled the update immediately after the problem came to light.

On the website of Microsoft, corporate blogger Michael Stroh wrote: "went perfectly with the upgrade process? No — but some large-scale software updates never do, and here the engineering team was prepared.

"Of course, when the phone is having a problem — or you're the one listening — is even worse."

The problem seems to have hit only phones Samsung, Omnia model in particular.

Bad connection

Microsoft said that most of those affected had a bad internet connection, or too little storage on the computer that the update was installed from.

Blog posting company directs users to a resolution line guide, as well as suggesting that visit its Windows phone forum.

Many of the messages on that website users detailed attempt to recover their phones.

Lphilly79 wrote: "I disconnected the phone, remove the battery and the phone started again in the original (v7004).

"It is not obvious, changes were made and everything is ok, it's exactly as it was before attempting to upgrade".

It seemed a member, called Eliuzhi, has had less luck: "now my phone is bricked can't do anything!"

Microsoft has stated that it will release a new update as soon as it has identified how to fix the problem.

The company is looking to grow its lucrative smartphone market share, having lost ground to Apple, Google and Blackberry.

It recently announced a tie-up with Nokia that would see the producer's laptop running Windows Phone on its smartphone devices.

New: Black inside Microsoft, in pursuit of new applications

That's why Bubblegum is an application for a nascent market: people who have the new Smartphone Windows Phone 7 software inside. The phones have been on the market for a few months in the United States. (Four models, including the Focus of Samsung, HTC Surround and the Quantum of LG, are each 100 $ at Microsoft).

But if many people are chosen in a crowded field led by iPhone and Android-based devices, these new phones will be required a large dose of an essential aphrodisiac: smartphone apps by the armload that add games, social connectivity and many other features.

Because the platform is new, developers must learn its ways before writing many of these programs. So adding them quickly, Microsoft took an unusual step. It has relaxed a strict rule and enable employees moonlight in their spare time and keep the resulting intellectual property and the majority of revenue, as long as this second job is to write applications for devices based on Windows Phone 7.

And did not do the job safely. The company is party downloads pizza for workers who step write code for the platform and are planning ways to publicize their work, including posters and recognition awards, said Brandon Watson, Director of developer experience for Windows Phone 7. Free phones based on Windows 7 you are given to all employees in 19 countries where phones are available.

The disadvantage is that if an application does not catch, there's money in it for employees who developed in their spare time. This makes it a less attractive incentive than, for example, some of those of Google, which has a policy of allowing engineers to spend 20% of their paid time on projects of their choice that benefit society.

But the change of rule change Microsoft is a starting point for a company that, like so many others, has traditionally been its engineers to give their all to their core jobs, said Michael a. Cusumano, Professor of management and systems engineering at the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is also co-author of "Microsoft Secrets" and the author of the recent "Staying Power," which has various chapters dedicated to the company.

"Engineers all work hours; They Punch a clock 9-to-5, "said Professor Cusumano. "Normally, you want employees to pay their passions in their jobs. If they do something on the other hand, you don't cheer them on. "

Mr. Watson of Microsoft, said that the change in policy emerged in part because of a boost from its group. "We tend to have strict black", said the company. "But we changed the rules so that developers can do in their spare time and have the financial advantage and the result of work".

The company is offering what Mr. Watson was a standard split on sales app: 70 percent for developers, 30 per cent to Microsoft.

The stimulus seems to help. More than 3,000 employees have registered to submit apps, he said, and so far have been published about 840.

One is Bubblegum. It was written by a married couple recently, Sriram Krishnan, program manager working for the company's cloud computing platform and Aarthi Ramamurthy, program manager on the Xbox team.

Mr. Krishnan, said that the app was definitely done in their spare time. "We were on our honeymoon in Hawaii when we started working on it," he said. "But we like to write code." (Continued to work on it during the Christmas holidays last year.)

Mr. Krishnan, said that with the app, he wanted to be among the first to capture the user base of Windows phone. He hopes that the app will give rise to a network of mini-social to your site, bubblegum, where users will be able to share photos. "The value is how many people are on it," he said.

He is worried that his side projects could raise eyebrows at Microsoft, and has already written a second app, a Web browser, for Windows phone. "Shows a test and a pick you. Microsoft is O.K. with that, "he said. "They were very favourable".

New rules of MICROSOFT, adapt to the wider rethinking how large companies manage the research, said Josh Lerner, Professor of investment banking at Harvard Business School. "Microsoft is not only rewarding people for what they do in their spare time," he said, but is also "harnessing the energy at the ends of the company" to catch up in the mobile market.

"It is symptomatic of a transformation bigger," he said, as a society to unlock more entrepreneurial activity, incentives and rewards for researchers in the hope that it will stay put rather than switch to other companies.

Professor Cusumano agrees that the change of rules promoting entrepreneurial activity. "Need companies like Microsoft who stick around for decades to reinvent yourself regularly," he said.

"Microsoft has been knock their heads against a wall, building more bells and whistles for Windows that anyone needs," said Professor Cusumano. "They can use their own staff in this way. It is a way to make every potential entrepreneur programmer and helps Microsoft intends its new mobile platform.

The change of rule provides an option for employees who do not want to leave for the insecurity of a start-up but still recognition for ideas, said Daniel h. Pink, author of "drive: the Surprising Truth about what motivates us."

"This is another way of saying, ' work here, and you can have the best of both worlds, ' as an employee of a company and as an entrepreneur," he said.

E-mail: novelties@nytimes.com.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Microsoft ships Service Pack 1 of Windows 7

Microsoft has announced that the first service pack for Windows 7 and Windows 2008 R2 hits the download servers starting today. The company had already released the final code to OEM partners before, 9 February, followed by MSDN and TechNet subscribers, customers, and volume licensing customers on 16 February, but now anyone will be able to do so via the website of the Microsoft Download Center, via Windows Update or here (links at the end of the download).

So, what can you expect from SP1? For Windows Server 2008, affect desktop virtualization platform from Microsoft that directly two new features: dynamic memory of Microsoft and Microsoft RemoteFX. The former offers an on-the-fly memory to a virtual machine while the latter provides a virtualized 3D graphics experience for remote users. For Windows 7, this is mostly a collection of minor bug fixes and updates that may have already installed, but also includes an updated Remote Desktop client which uses RemoteFX.

Still, the release of Windows 7 SP1 is an important milestone as it might help to further fuel operating system adoption among enterprises, which generally wait for kinks to be ironed out before jumping on the bandwagon.

Note that users who are running an earlier iteration of SP1, including a beta or release candidate, you will need to uninstall it first catch before the final release. Instructions on how to uninstall a service pack is available here.

Download Link:
Service Pack 1 32-bit Microsoft Windows 7
Microsoft Windows 7 & Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 64-bit



Thursday, February 24, 2011

Microsoft CIO: before you go to Google, ask questions

The mounting pressure to move resources EN the cloud has added a level of complexity to an already complex work of CIO.

To tackle the difficult cloud migration, Microsoft has posted a blog listing five key themes that society is heard from IT leaders consider parts of their business on the move to a cloud platform. Two standout themes are the desire for a long-term commitment by a provider of cloud and the guarantee of security and privacy.

Yet another theme in the minds of CIOS, according to the blog writer Ron Markezich, corporate VP of Microsoft Online, is the definition of what should be a provider of cloud: a service provider or a business partner?

Businesses want to overwhelming majority a partner with a proven track record in enterprise which can establish a roadmap to long-term, writes Markezich. In a separate post for this week, Markezich goes a step further by calling out Google rival Microsoft cloud as a wannabe enterprise with commitment problems.

Microsoft is clearly feeling the footsteps of Google. Last fall the search giant announced that it has 3 million Google Apps customers.

Latest blog Post Microsoft wants to remind buyers that is "all in" for cloud and decades more business acumen than this Internet research company called Google feisty.

Microsoft apprehension is understandable. The software giant was winning cloud deals with government agencies and organizations to use its BPOS suite of cloud services for email, collaboration and productivity apps (now called Office 365). But in December, Google beat Microsoft to a whopper with GSA contract for 6.7 million in five years for the migration of 17,000 employees of Government out different versions of IBM Lotus Notes and Domino software to Google Apps.

In addition, Google has landed contracts with agencies of State Government, as the State of Wyoming and in November, Google has filed a lawsuit against the Department of the Interior, arguing that DOI bidding process for a contract worth € 49.3 million in five years benefited, unjustly, Microsoft.

So needless to say, there is a cloud of war going on between these giants tech and Google is winning a surprising amount of offers of Government. Undertakings may be far behind?

Blog Post deliberately targets Google Markezich as he lists five questions that CIOs should ask when negotiating with Google over its own cloud services.

You have a proven track record?

"Microsoft believes that the best approach is to help organizations move the cloud on their terms, not ours. Our track record in assisting corporate clients to achieve their goals speaks for itself. Does Google? "

How much it cost to get my people productive?

"Why firms resist fully deploying Google Apps? Because it means that users who are accustomed to Microsoft Office, accepting limited interoperability with other line of business applications, retraining and dealing with limited functionality of Google is expensive.

What are your privacy policies?

"Do a careful review of the privacy policy; You will always know where your data? Microsoft designs its solutions from the ground up for security and privacy and are supported by two decades of business needs.

What is your roadmap to long term?

"Google and others often surprise their clients unexpectedly by removing important features or adding new-which increases both headache and cost. We understand that you operate a business, not a laboratory for our newest experiment. "

You can support all of my people with what they need?

"Not everyone in a company is located on the campus of Silicon Valley with high speed Internet and not all of them don't even have a dedicated computer. What they need is access to business resources. Microsoft provides a variety of options for the different roles people play in your company. "

Click here for the full blog post from Microsoft.

Shane O'Neill covers Microsoft Windows, operating systems, productivity applications and Online services for CIO.com. Follow Shane on Twitter @ smoneill. Follow everything from CIO.com on Facebook and Twitter @ CIOonline. Shane email to soneill@idgenterprise.com

Read more about cloud computing in the Cloud Computing drill-down of the IOC.



Microsoft has fixed a Security Bug in its antivirus-

Microsoft has corrected a bug in its malware scanning engine that could be used as a stepping stone to an attacker trying to hijack a Windows window.

The bug is fixed in an update to the Microsoft Malware Protection Engine that has been pushed out to users of security products from Microsoft on Wednesday. Is what is known as an elevation of privilege vulnerability--something that could be used by an attacker who already has access to the Windows system to capture the full administrative control.

Microsoft has not seen anyone exploit the bugs still--the defect was reported to the company by Cesar Cerrudo security researcher--but Microsoft thinks that hackers could develop code that exploits the issue reliably.

In an interview of instant message, Cerrudo, CEO of security research firm Argeniss, said that he disclosed publicly Conference Black Hat security bug in July 2010. But because the hacker need would already have access to the machine to pull off this attack, he does not believe that presents a serious security risk for most users.

"This vulnerability can be exploited remotely, for instance on the Internet Information Server, but the attacker must be able to upload any code running on IIS," he said. "Sites that allow users to upload Web pages, are most at risk."

Microsoft rates it as "important".

An attacker could exploit this flaw by changing a Windows registry key to a special value, who would then processed by the engine at its subsequent malware scan.

This would be useful if the criminal was already on a machine that had the blocked user's privileges. "An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code ... and take complete control of the system," Microsoft said in a security advisory released Wednesday. "An attacker could then install programs; view, edit, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.

The issue is fixed in version 1.1.6603.0 of the Malware Protection Engine, which is used in Windows Live OneCare, Microsoft Security Essentials, Windows Defender, Forefront Client Security, Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010 and the Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool.

Consumers should obtain the fix automatically as part of the monthly update of Microsoft to its malware scanner.

This is not the first time that Microsoft has found bug in its security software. Bug in Malware Protection Engine is reportedly back in 2007 and 2008.

Robert McMillan covers the security of your computer and General technology breaking news for the IDG News Service. Follow Robert on Twitter at @ bobmcmillan. E-mail address is robert_mcmillan@idg.com, Robert



Google Microsoft fights for Government dollars

Microsoft used the Summit annual public sector CIO to highlight the use of its cloud services and grab some digs at Google, which has won some contracts of the high profile public sector itself.

Microsoft Wednesday announced 16 new education and Government clients, including public schools in Portland, Oregon; the city of Alexandria, Virginia; Colorado Department of labor and employment; and the city of Carlsbad, California.

5000 faculty and staff of Portland will begin using the service of Microsoft Live@edu this year and 46,000 students will have access to it, shortly after, Microsoft said. Live@edu is a service email and collaboration for schools.

The district is replacing an aging Novell GroupWise system and expects to save money and improve the relationship between teachers and students, said Nick Jwayad, CIO of Portland Public Schools.

In a press release, Microsoft that sang that Portland public schools and the University of Albany-SUNY-had chosen Microsoft over Google Apps. It is also said that Winston-Salem, North Carolina, is migrating its 600 business users of Google Apps and 2150 Novell GroupWise users to Microsoft Online Business Process Suite.

BPOS is a Microsoft-hosted services offering including Exchange, Sharepoint and Office Live Meeting.

Microsoft also said that it was close to getting FISMA certification for its BPOS services. It has already obtained certification for its data centers and expects to complete the process for applications within a month or so, said Kulcon.

The Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) is a rigorous safety standards that some federal agencies are required to comply. Google Apps is already certified FISMA.

Microsoft complained also some cases where it is said that government agencies that have used Google services unfairly or in a manner that can compromise security.

For example, Microsoft claims that the General Services Administration (GSA), which awarded a contract to Google Apps, last year, changed his contract during the bidding process to allow data to be stored outside of the United States. At Microsoft, which seemed to be a concession that would allow Google to win the contract.

Microsoft is also complain of what's called a lack of full support for the OpenDocument format in Google Docs, which is used at least informally by some agencies of Government. When Google Docs renders documents in ODF, alter them, for example, changing the page numbers, said Curt Kolcun, vice President of the United States public sector at Microsoft. Microsoft was under pressure from around the globe from government agencies who insisted they support open document standards.

Kolcun also cited a situation where the GSA invited comments on its draft FedRamp. Asked by companies or individuals to upload their comments on Google Docs, he said. Microsoft was worried about the rights that Google could have the documents. Microsoft complained to the GSA and was permitted to submit its observations, using the Excel program, said Kolcun.

Google said that it does not own the data that people put in its systems and points to its privacy policy, which focuses on how Google handles users ' personal information, such as their name and email address.

In 2009, Google had to fix a bug that Google Docs inadvertently shared some with people, even if the author hadn't shared them. The sharing was restricted to the persons the user had shared documents with previously.

Kolcun also pointed out delays in deploying Google Apps to Los Angeles, in part because of concerns about the safety of the Police Department.

Google has had his share of success, however. Won a contract to offer hosted e-mail, the GSA that will become the first federal agency to use this service. He also won deals to offer Google Apps to agencies in Washington, D.C. and Orlando, Florida.

Microsoft says there are now more than 3 million government employees using some form of Microsoft Online services. In addition, more than 15 million people use its services Live@edu.

Businesses see very clearly at stake in the field of Government. Late last year, Google has sued the Department of the Interior after it invited tenders for a cloud e-mail system but bidders are required to use Microsoft products.

Nancy Gohring covers phones and cloud computing to the IDG News Service. Follow Nancy on Twitter at @ idgnancy. E-mail address is Nancy_Gohring@idg.com, Nancy



Microsoft update, Windows Phone 7 botches---is this phone jinxed?

Microsoft just can't seem to get Windows Phone 7 right---this time it has botched a minor update for Samsung phones, which "brick" devices so that they are unnecessary. Then compounded the error apparently not pulling the update after it said it had. Not so for Android and iPhone.

Within the last few days, Microsoft has started pushing a minor update to Windows Phone 7. This is not the important update, since I would like to add features like copy and paste. The update is designed to enhance the built-in updater, so that future updates will work correctly. Yes, you read that right---Microsoft botched an update for an updater.

Shortly after the upgrade began to be pushed to users of phones, Samsung Windows Phone 7 devices began reporting that the devices were being bricked by update. Microsoft first replied by saying that "We are investigating reports related to the process of updating Windows Phone and will provide more information and guidance as it becomes available," according to Mary Jo Foley.

Then today, Microsoft announced it was pulling the update. Computerworld reports that Microsoft said:

"We have identified a technical problem with the process of updating Windows Phone that impacts a small number of phones. In response to this emerging problem, we have temporarily taken down the latest update of the software for mobile phones Samsung in order to correct the problem. "

But it seems that Microsoft could not, in fact, they pulled the update. Several sites, including World and Mobile Tech report wpcentral that the update has not yet been extracted.

This is just the latest of the comedy of errors that has become the mobile strategy at Microsoft. Has released a smartphone OS well before Apple or Google and then let it rot while Apple and Google launched smartphone operating systems that now dominate the market. It has launched the ill-fated Kin, one of the worst phone ever designed. The launch of Windows Phone 7, designed to give Microsoft the chance to fight in the mobile market, it was just exciting at best. And now you can manage to release a minor update correctly---or resolve the issue, when he finds out.

Microsoft made the right move, when it signed an agreement with Nokia to Windows Phone 7. But if it cannot successfully its strategy, all the billions that will pay for that affair will be wasted. This latest problem is not a good sign, that is able to get Windows Phone 7 right.



Sunday, February 20, 2011

Microsoft has a change of heart about keeping the Internet safe

ISPS should those who maintain hacked PC anywhere? Security chief executive of Microsoft used to think so, but now had a change of heart.

Speaking at the RSA Conference Tuesday, Microsoft Corporate Vice President for Trustworthy Computing Scott Charney said that she thought it was a good idea to be service providers that those on the hook to keep infected PCS from the rest of the Internet.

"Last year at RSA, I said, ' you know we need to think about ISP, because the IOC for the public sector, and we need to think about their consumer scan machines and making sure they are clean and possibly quarantined them from the Internet, '" he said. "But over the last year as I thought much more about this I realized that there are many flaws with that model."

Consumers can see security scans as invasive and an invasion of privacy and with more and more people use the Internet as their telephone, quarantining a PC could amount to cutting off someone's 911 service, he said. "We see the scenery, right: a heart attack, I ran to my computer, it says, you must install four patches and reboot before you can access the Internet. That is not the experience that we strive for ".

Then there is the biggest problem of all. ISP would have to bear the costs. "Puts a lot of burden on ISPs, because they are the ones that are gating access to the Internet," said Charney.

ISPs have experimented with different ways to reduce the infected computers. Comcast, for example, has a service called constant guard that warn customers when they have a security problem.

But cut infected customer service is a costly proposition. "It takes only a phone call from a consumer to make you lose your profit margin for the year" on users, said Craig Labovitz, chief scientist with firm Arbor Networks, in a telephone interview network monitoring.

Labovitz said that technology companies are coming up with new ways to rid the world of infected machines for about two decades now, without success. "Even if we force end users to maintain their patch update there are still a huge number of zero days," he said, referring to defects in software patches that can be used to take a fully patched PCS. "It's an arms race that keeps going. There is certainly any single bullet. "

Still, Charney thinks that there are ways to improve things.

He thinks the company Internet could take a page from organizations like the World Health Organization and find new ways to keep infected PCs away from the rest of the network--to "enforce goodness," he said.

Perhaps the solution is for consumers to share trusted certificates on the health of their personal computers--including data if running anti-virus or is fully patched--Charney suggested. He called this "collective defence". An example? A bank may ask customers to sign up for a program that would scan the PC for signs of infection during online sessions. If there is a problem, the Bank could limit then what the customer might make--topping out at $ 2000 transactions, for example.

That may end up to be a more viable model for the Internet, said Charney. "The user remains in control. The user can say I don't want to pass a health certificate, "said" there can be consequences to that decision, but you can do it. "

Robert McMillan covers the security of your computer and General technology breaking news for the IDG News Service. Follow Robert on Twitter at @ bobmcmillan. E-mail address is robert_mcmillan@idg.com, Robert



Saturday, February 19, 2011

Microsoft Windows flaw: don't worry

Microsoft ignored the threat to Windows users from vulnerability revealed recently, saying that it was unlikely that the bug can be exploited to compromise a computer.

Artwork: Dlite Chip defect in network Windows Server Message Block (SMB) file sharing protocol and was disclosed Monday by someone identified only as "Cupidon-3005" on the mailing list for Security Full Disclosure. Cupidon-3005 posted code Proof-of-concept to the list.

The French and Danish researchers said the latest hacker may be able to exploit this bug to hijack Windows PCs. (see also "25 years: Windows ' worst moments")

Last week, Microsoft said it was not so.

"Based on our initial investigation of this vulnerability cannot be exploited for remote code execution (RCE) on 32-bit platforms," said Jerry Bryant, a General Manager in the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC). "We are studying the possibility of execution of code on 64-bit platforms, but so far haven't found one likely scenario that would result in reliable code execution."

An attack that exploits the bug SMB instead would result in a denial of service, "said Bryant, using the term that describes a crash of a window that requires rebooting the PC. Windows hangs often informs users of the terrible situation with the infamous "blue screen of death."

In an explanatory blog post, MSRC engineer Mark Wodrich echo take Bryant likely remote code execution, saying that it was impossible on a 32-bit version of Windows due to memory limitations, and feasible on Windows 64-bit only if more than 8 GB of memory was present.

Even then, said Wodrich, "we feel that the trigger any such condition reliably timing will be very difficult".

HD Moore, head of security at Rapid7 and the creator of the open source Metasploit penetration toolkit, played well.

"We have not seen any solid examples of code execution, even if it turns out to be possible," Moore said in an e-mail reply to questions Wednesday. He added that a researcher Metasploit was also looking at the bug and published attack code Cupidon-3005 to see if he could be a form of reliable exploits for Metasploit.

All versions of Windows contain the bug, said Wodrich, but servers running as the primary Domain Controller (PDC)--the system that controls the network domain--are more vulnerable.

Microsoft exploitability index pegged the vulnerability scores a "3", which means that the company does not expect reliable attack code will appear in the next 30 days.

Some researchers doom diminish Microsoft threat.

"Microsoft is now called any hard-to-exploit vulnerabilities (e.g., SMB) a "Denial of Service"! What's next? ", asked the French firm Vupen security in a tweet earlier today.

"Have been doing this forever, MSRC is about managing incidents of PR, improves safety," said Tavis Ormandy in a reply to the tweet of Vupen.

Ormandy, Google security engineer, Microsoft heads with pipes has before--especially last summer, when he released exploit code for a bug in Windows Help and Support Center after he said Microsoft has refused to set a deadline of patches.

Microsoft Bryant said MSRC researchers are willing to investigate the bug, and I will release a patch or workaround to protect users.

Although Tuesday's next scheduled Patch-is three weeks away, it is unlikely that a fix will be delivered then unless a large number of attacks in the wild exploiting vulnerabilities-are displayed.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and General technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @ gkeizer or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed. His e-mail address is gkeizer@computerworld.com.

To learn more about security in Computerworld Security Center topic.


For more enterprise computing news, visit Computerworld. Story copyright © 2010 Computerworld Inc. All rights reserved.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Nokia CEO: Microsoft us billions, I'm not a Trojan horse

Nokia CEO Stephen Elop, a former head of Microsoft, is to defend the company has decided to move to Windows Phone as its primary smartphone platform and cut thousands of jobs. He told analysts and practitioners that, apart from the benefits of the Alliance that have already been explained, Microsoft is paying Nokia billion as part of the transaction.

"For all unique items that Nokia is contributing, including swing factor, including the decision to make Windows Phone challenger, Microsoft is contributing to substantial monetary value to Nokia Nokia, because we are helping all these unique things," said Elop at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. "During our investor briefing upon a slide where we had only one row with little green checkmarks saying ' marketing ' and other investments from Microsoft to Nokia. I think some people interpreted as something that should be measured in millions or tens of millions of people, as are most of the transfers of marketing value. In fact, when you look at all the value that we are helping and the uniqueness of what we bring to the table as part of this transaction, the value transferred to Nokia is measured in Bs, not Ms. "

At the event in Barcelona, Elop was also asked if he was a "Trojan horse". Since Elop has worked for Microsoft since January 2008 through September 2010 as head of Business software giants, the obvious implication is that Microsoft he planted to Nokia to steer the company in a direction favorable to the software giant. Nokia has also recently appointed Chris Weber, former Corporate Vice President, us Enterprise leader of Microsoft and Partner Group, as Chairman of Nokia (United States) and head of the markets in North America.

Of course, Elop denied insinuation. "The obvious answer is no," he said. "We made sure that the entire management team has been involved in the process, and of course the Nokia Board of Directors is the only ones who can make this important decision on Nokia. Made the final decision on Thursday night. "

Elop responded also confirmed that Microsoft had quotas, saying that it has stopped selling its shares before the announcement of the deal last week, as required by law. "To me, being the seventh largest shareholder of Microsoft: this is not true," he said. "It would be a significant amount of money that I didn't. When I moved from Microsoft to Nokia, I was legally forbidden to sell my shares. Just that lifted, I started to sell. But when he started our discussions, I had to stop selling yet; the laws are very clear. As soon as the legal restrictions, of course you can sell Lift those quotas. " Elop holds shares of approximately 130,000 worth 3.18 million.

Nokia fans should not see this as a kind of betrayal. As Elop scored his position, it does not matter: the fact is that all Nokia management chosen unanimously Windows phone. What can we say, however, is that since Elop has a close relationship with Microsoft, he will work twice as hard to make sure that the deal completes.



Microsoft shows WP7 integration with Xbox Kinect

At Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Microsoft unveiled not only what was coming to Windows Phone 7 this year, but Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer decided it was time to raise the curtain on a Technology Preview featuring WP7 and Kinect Xbox. Microsoft Game Studios showed off two women using their phones Windows to shoot balls in the game ball Rally that a man was playing on Kinect.

In the video, it is clear that the console and the phone are communicating real-time, probably on Wi-Fi. This is not only motion sensing Kinect brought to the phone; This is input from the mobile phone player is added to a game of Kinect, turning your phone into an auxiliary controller. In other words, some kind of multiplayer platforms in the world Microsoft is coming:

Microsoft has sold 8 million Kinect units in 60 days. Wp7 sales weren't nearly as good, but if this type of game is collected, we would bet that the two will help each other. Wp7 is attractive for players already as it comes with the integration of Xbox Live, but what you see above is a completely different ball game (excuse the pun).

"The technology shown in the video is real and is an example of the types of experiences we'll be bringing to market," said a spokesman for Microsoft in a statement. "We remain committed to build a network that connects to your friends and entertainment in innovative ways. This is just one example of what's possible as we explore new ways to interact with our technology. At this time, we discuss specific experiences aren t we ll be bid or a timeline of product, but we look forward to sharing more in the future. "



Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Nokia Microsoft deal leads to shareholder revolt, calling for a "plan B"

Were the celebrations champagne a Nokia-Microsoft partnership premature?

An unnamed group of nine young Nokia shareholders "were also employees at some point today published an open letter to the company of other shareholders and institutional investors, in a nutshell, said that the deal with Microsoft is a bad one for Nokia and that CEO Stephen Elop should be replaced. (Techmeme)

In the letter, the group said it intends to contest the collaboration of Microsoft and the strategy of the company's annual general meeting of shareholders on May 3. He said that he also developed an approach of "plan B" that involves not only replacing Elop but also looks to renew the strategy of hiring company and eliminate "outdated and bureaucratic R&D practices."

These shareholders said they want to avoid at all costs, "becoming a poorly differentiated OEM with only low margin commodities that are able to attract top talent and software cannot create value for shareholders but innovation."

In past generations, a small group of shareholders may have had trouble generating support for a plan that runs contrary to what the leaders determine to be best. But in the modern age of communication, the Group has spread its message virally over the Internet and other calls-from other shareholders to ventilators, employees, users or developers-join the cause by spreading the word through its blog, Twitter and Facebook.

It is not clear whether these shareholders will gain any traction with their efforts-but they seem to be in good company. Financial markets also seem to have a bad feeling about this agreement with Microsoft, which, like Nokia, suddenly you find yourself scrambling to catch up because it failed to respond and innovate fast enough when the market is headed.

It's almost ironic that HP, which has been a long time partner is distancing itself from Microsoft on the mobile front, pushing its WebOS on Windows while the Nokia, which has also seen a decline in its leadership mobile, would turn to Microsoft as his Savior.

Separately, the Mobile World Congress Conference in Barcelona today, Google CEO Eric Schmidt said his company severely tried Woo Nokia and that the two were involved in discussions confidential "extended", according to a Reuters report.

see also:Fear of Google has pushed the collaboration of Nokia-Microsoft

Meanwhile, Nokia Executive VP Mary McDowell told Bloomberg that Microsoft was the only put before the governing body of a vote at the meeting on 10 February, a day before Elop and CEO Microsoft has made their announcement of partnership. McDowell said Bloomberg:

We put three scenarios: continue with the current record, an option of Google and an option of Microsoft but the recommendation that we did to them was the option of Microsoft so that what they have approved.

That report noted that, since then, Nokia shares decreased by 18 percent and wiped out about $ 5.5 billion, or 7.4 billion, the company's market value.

Previous coverage:

Sam Diaz is a senior editor at ZDNet.



Microsoft continues to push for infected computer from quarantine

SAN FRANCISCO — Microsoft's Scott Charney is pushing forward with a proposal for a public health model to stem the damage by botnet malware loads of computers in the world.

During a keynote presentation (see documentation) of the RSA Conference here, Charney trumpeted a "global Internet health model" that uses existing technologies and organizational policies for implementing a system that restricts what can an infected computer on the Internet.

Charney's message was much the same, as it was last year when the head of the Microsoft Trustworthy Computing called on ISPs to be aggressive and take off Internet access to infected computers.

This year, Charney took his message further, suggesting that computer users can opt into a Web-based program that provides warnings when there are security risks identifies.

Charney "Inform in advance individuals of security problems or configuration issues provides a first step in transforming computer security posture from reactive to proactive power," he added.

In an accompanying white paper (.PDF), Charney suggested that the concept of health device could benefit from a more aggressive approach to identify infected devices.  In particular, has requested an analysis and hte data sharing by sinkholes, network traffic and telemetry product to identify potentially infected devices.

"If a device is known to be a threat to the Internet, the user should be notified and the device must be cleaned before they are allowed unrestricted access to the Internet while minimizing the risk of infected device or otherwise contaminate other devices interfere with legitimate activities on the Internet," said Charney.

In most cases, Charney said that this can be done with current technology across multiple systems and platforms and stressed that Comcast already is making attempts to quarantine dirty machines.

"It is our view that approaches like this needs to be expanded significantly, even at a global level," he added.

On the consumer side, said that we need a mechanism to clean computer demonstrate their "good health" (health certificate) without rendering systems more vulnerable and less reliable, or providing a conduit for the loss of private information.

Secondly, the mechanism that produced the health certificate must be trusted (i.e., infected devices should not have a way to fake a health certificate) by combining reliable software as hypervisor 0.14 and hardware items as a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) could allow consumer devices also create certificates of robust health and ensure the integrity of user information. 15 Thirdly, access providers and other organizations must have a way to request health certificates and take appropriate action, based on information provided. Finally, we must create rules to ensure the effectiveness of this model and supporting policies.

In this model, Charney said a car consumers seeking access to the Internet may be asked to submit a "certificate of health" to prove his status. Although the conditions to be checked may change over time, said that health controls should ensure that you apply software patches, a firewall is installed and configured correctly, an antivirus program is executed with signatures and the machine is not infected by known malware.

If the health certificate indicates a security issue, eg a patch missing or outdated antivirus signatures, Charney said that an ISP may provide a notice that assists you in dealing with the problem of safety or directs the user to resources for reclaiming.

"If the problem is more severe (the machine is spewing malicious packets), or if the user refuses to submit a certificate of health in the first instance, other remedies, such as bandwidth throttling device potentially infected, it may be appropriate," he added.

The idea to quarantine infected users to protect the ecosystem of the Internet is not new, but security experts say that unless ISPs have a financial incentive to implement these patterns, these initiatives will go nowhere.

Ryan Naraine is a journalist and a social media enthusiast specializing in issues of security of the Internet and computers.



Windows startup: Microsoft is wrong is right, Computerworld

The vast majority of articles on the recent change to the State of AutoRun for Windows XP, Vista, Server 2003 and Server 2008 that Microsoft has just released an update that will be installed automatically.

This is not true.

In honesty printing tech, Microsoft said this themselves.

Microsoft Security Advisory (967940): update for Windows AutoRun was published in February 2009. The corresponding patch, published in August 2009, was only available to techies who knew to look for it. The patch has changed the way they worked in those versions AutoRun in Windows to simulate the behavior of Windows 7.

Security Advisory was updated February 2011 to add the following:

The AutoRun update described in Microsoft Knowledge Base article 971029 is now offered via automatic updates. Customers with automatic update enabled will not take any action because this update will be downloaded and installed automatically.

It's a sad commentary on Microsoft that this is not the case.

What actually happened is that the patch was added as an optional Windows Update/Microsoft Update. Users of automatic updates will not have the patch applied. You must still manually to find her. It's just a little easier to find.

Kudos to both Gregg Keizer, who writes for Computerworld and Paul Thurrott in Windows IT Pro. Both stressed that the change of AutoRun is not installed automatically and both describes the manual steps required to install the patch under Windows XP. Their articles are below:

This shows a difference between members of the press tech that parrot back what they read elsewhere and those who take the time to kick the tires.

Defensive Computing part is knowing whom to trust. Going forward, I will put more trust in the writings of Keizer is Thurrott.

STILL NOT FULLY PROTECTED

Taking a step back, however, Windows users should be aware that the update is incomplete.

Even with it installed, Windows computers can get infected when inserting a USB based device, the device needs to do is go to the system as a CD or DVD, that still support AutoRun.

In the update for the AutoPlay feature in Microsoft Windows Says:

Some USB flash drives have firmware with these USB flash drives such as CD drive when you insert them into your computer. These USB flash drives are not affected by this update.

Gregg Keizer reported in his article, that

... the delay of more than year-to-a-half to push the Autorun update to Windows Update is designed to give providers of legitimate software that uses the time to recraft the functionality for their programs. Most have transformed the U3 specification ... to run automatically on their software from removable media.

Personally I've run across more than one external hard drive that Windows is presented as an external hard drive is a CD drive. Without doubt this is done to promote the automatic installation of software preloaded on external hard drive.

I wrote about a battleship approach to disabling AutoRun Back in January 2009. This approach, an update to registry easy, applies to all devices, such as CDs and DVDs.

See the best way to disable AutoRun for protection from infected USB flash drive and test the defenses against malicious USB flash drive.

Defensive Computing is the thing.

Update: 12 February 2011:

Larry Seltzer, PC Magazine has been one of the many who got some facts wrong AutoRun. February 11, published a correction. However, his initial posting, from 8 February, has not been corrected. What did change in the initial registration, were the comments. What I had left, correcting facts, has been deleted.



Microsoft needs to learn how to talk about Apple and Android

Five years ago, Microsoft may have been justified in assuming that every visitor to your web site is running Windows. In 2011, in such circumstances are not realistic. Yes, Windows still commands an overwhelming market share for desktop PCs and laptops, but these days people get information from other places, like Android Smartphone and iPad and MacBook Pro. None of these devices are running Microsoft operating systems.

Microsoft is aware that these other markets exist, of course. They got Office for Mac 2011, and have just released Microsoft OneNote to iOS devices like the iPhone and iPad, you can get Windows Live Mesh for Mac. There are applications Bing for iOS and Android (on all U.S. carriers as last November. Most of the Microsoft online services these days work incredibly well in non-Microsoft browsers on non-Microsoft devices. So why isn't Microsoft talk directly to people who use those other operating systems and devices?

I thought earlier this morning, when I had an odd interaction with Microsoft.com. As you might recall, I am using a Mac and a PC side by side for the past few months, moving between environments throughout the day and, sometimes, as part of the task.

This morning, someone on Twitter pointed me to a bookmark manager add-on for Internet Explorer. That tweet includes a link that took me to the IE Add-ons page at Microsoft.com. Clicked on a link in TweetDeck, which opened the page in Google Chrome. On a Mac.

Now, Microsoft should know that I am using a Mac and no Windows. It's right there in the user agent string that went along with my request:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_6; Chrome/9.0.597.94 for EN-US) AppleWebKit/526.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/533.13

So, here is a close-up of what I have served in reply:

"We recommend that you install Internet Explorer 8 for free". Really? How very careful.

Except I can't. As you and I and everyone on the planet knows, Microsoft does not make a version of Internet Explorer for OS X, or indeed for any operating system besides Windows. So this is a bit empty. But there is.

And what happens when you click Download now? Get this:

As user experience goes, this is pretty awesome. It is almost a bait-and-switch.

Microsoft: "You want Internet Explorer for free?

Me: "sure, why not?"

[click]

Microsoft: "Sorry, that you may have. Can we sell is Windows 7 instead? "

The first page was perfectly able to detect my operating system. When you see that I am running OS X and Windows, knows that for a dead certainty that I cannot install Internet Explorer. It should not force me to go to another web page to learn this truism.

Get a result equally useless if you visit the Microsoft Fix It Solution Center on the Mac. Imagine this scenario: I have a PC and a Mac at home. For some reason, my PC cannot reach the Internet. You cannot use it to find help online. So I am going to Mac, where my connection is alive and well, and I make my way to the Microsoft support site. Here's what I found:

Those top two audio solutions as they're worth trying. But now button a run? Really? Maybe they can run on a Mac.

But there is, and not saying anything like "Windows only". So I click and Chrome downloads a Windows executable file and saves it in the downloads folder on my Mac. At that point, I am my own.

They may provide some instructions on how to copy this file to a USB flash drive and then run it on your PC. But that is not the case, and I left to figure things out for me.

A lot of devices these days is running non-Microsoft operating systems, including phones and tablets. Smartphones are outselling PCs in many markets. In the scenario above, where I need help to understand why my Windows PC can connect to the Internet, I could use a Android powered phone or an iPad to seek help through a connection 3 G.

Every visitor who comes to microsoft.com using a Mac or an iPhone or a droid has slightly different information needs and challenges of interoperability of new and interesting. It would be smart to anticipate these needs? In the process, instead of trying to sell me a copy of Windows 7, why can't I point to services like Bing and Windows Live SkyDrive which will help me to connect my PC Windows and my device not Windows?

Microsoft is missing an opportunity here. Really.

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades experience writing for mainstream media and publications online.